Monodualistic and Pluralistic Punishment Politics in Criminal Code Reform: Lessons from Indonesia
Article Sidebar
Download : 167 times
Main Article Content
Abstract
This research analyzes the problem of punishment in the current Criminal Code because there is a mismatch of socio-political, socio-philosophical, and socio-cultural foundations. This study also analyzes the problems in the current Criminal Code punishment due to the strong retributive influence on punishment so that imprisonment becomes the sole answer for judges in deciding cases. In connection with the various problems of punishment in the Criminal Code, efforts are made to reform the Criminal Code, which is adjusted to the socio-political, socio-philosophical, and socio-cultural foundations so that the reform of the Criminal Code has a mono-dualistic and pluralistic nature. The purpose of this research is to find how the concepts of mono-dualistic and pluralistic influence the reformation of the Criminal Code as well as the political direction of punishment in the reformation of the Criminal Code. Based on the research, the author found that the mono-dualistic and pluralistic nature of the Criminal Code reform influences the material expansion of the principle of legality. In addition, criminal code reform has a contemporary direction that prioritizes not only deterrent effects but also rehabilitative efforts so that it can restore social functions.
Adhigama Andre Budiman et al. 2020 Indonesian Death Penalty Report: Taking Lives During Pandemic. Jakarta: Institute Criminal Justice Reform, 2020.
Ahmad Wiram As-Suvi and Moh. Zainullah. “Sociology of Law in The Perspective of Roscoe Pound and Donald Black and Its Relevance in The Indonesian Context”. Peradaban Journal of Law and Society 1, No. 2 (2022). https://doi.org/10.59001/pjls.v1i2.39.
Ateng Sudibyo and Aji Halim Rahman. “Dekonstruksi Asas Legalitas dalam Hukum Pidana”. Presumption of Law 3, No. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.31949/jpl.v3i1.985.
Barda Nawawi Arief. Kebijakan Hukum Pidana. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group, 2008.
Brian Z. Tamanaha. On The Rule of Law: History, Policy, Theory. Cambridge: University Press, 2004.
Ardi, Muhamad Khalif, Muhammad Ikhsan Kamil, Devi Triasari, and Doris Rahmat, ‘The Imperative Is to Restrict Customary Criminal Offenses after Implementing Indonesia ’ s New Criminal Code’, Wacana Hukum, 29.2 (2023), 130–45 <https://doi.org/10.33061/wh.v29i2.9829>
Bain, Andy, ‘Please Recycle: Continuities in Punishment’, International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 39.2 (2011), 121–35 <https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2011.05.002>
Basuki, Agung, M Zaid, Alnour Abobaker, and Mohamed Musa, ‘Establishing Ecological Justice in the Governance of Land Inventory , Ownership , and Utilisation in Indonesia’, Journal of Law, Environmental and Justice Environmental and Justice, 18.2 (2023), 137–54 <https://doi.org/10.62264/jlej.v1i2.12>
Buchan, Bruce, ‘Zero Tolerance, Mandatory Sentencing and Early Liberal Arguments for Penal Reform’, International Journal of the Sociology of Law, 30.3 (2002), 201–18 <https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/S0194-6595(02)00025-4>
Daems, Tom, ‘Compatible Victims? Prison Overcrowding and Penal Reform in Belgium’, International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 36.3 (2008), 153–67 <https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2008.04.001>
Diala, Anthony C., ‘The Concept of Living Customary Law: A Critique’, Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unofficial Law, 49.2 (2017), 143–65 <https://doi.org/10.1080/07329113.2017.1331301>
Dede Kania. “Pidana Penjara dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia”. Jurnal Yustisia 3, No. 2 (2014). https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v3i2.11088.
Dedi Waluyo et al. “Pembaharuan Sistem Pemidanaan, Khususnya Pidana Penjara (Studi Kemasyarakatan)”. Supremasi Hukum 18, No. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.33592/jsh.v18i01.2282.
Denis Yukhnenko, Leen Farouki, and Seena Fazel. “Criminal Recidivism Rates Globally: A 6 Year Systematic Review Update”. Journal of Criminal Justice 88, (2023). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcrimjus.2023.102115.
Diah Ratu Sari. “Pengaturan Pidana Pengawasan dan Pidana Kerja Sosial dalam Rancangan KUHP sebagai Upaya Menerapkan Daad-Dader Strafrecht”. Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i 9, No. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.15408/sjsbs.v9i1.24338.
Faisal and Muhammad Rustamaji. “Pembaharuan Pilar Hukum Pidana dalam RUU KUHP”. Jurnal Magister Hukum Udaya (Udayana Master Law Journal) 10, No. 2 (2021). 10.24843/JMHU.2021.v10.i02.p08.
Fadlian, Aryo, ‘Pertanggungjawaban Pidana Dalam Suatu Kerangka Teoritis’, Jurnal Hukum Positum, 5.2 (2020), 10–19
Farhan, Athil Khaleel, ‘Divergence in the Translation of Criminal Law: A Corpus-Based Study of Prohibition in Iraqi Penal Code and Its English Translation’, Ampersand, 10 (2023), 100104 <https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amper.2022.100104>
Griffiths, John, ‘Legal Pluralism’, in International Encyclopedia of the Social & Behavioral Sciences (Second Edition), ed. by James D Wright, Second Edi (Oxford: Elsevier, 2015), pp. 757–61 <https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-08-097086-8.86073-0>
Gaëtan Cliquennois, Sonja Snacken, and Dirk van Zyl Smit. “Can European Human Rights Instruments Limit the Power of the National State to Punish? A Tale of Two Europes”. European Journal of Criminology 18, No. 1 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1177/1477370820980354.
H. Yacob Djasmani. “Hukum sebagai Alat Rekayasa Sosial dalam Praktek Berhukum di Indonesia”. Masalah-Masalah Hukum 40, No. 3 (2011). 10.14710/mmh.40.3.2011.365-374.
I Gusti Ngurah Bayu Pradiva and Diah Ratna Sari Hariyanto. “Perluasan Asas Legalitas dalam RKUHP Sebagai Upaya Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana Indonesia”. Jurnal Kertha Semaya 10, No. 8 (2022). https://doi.org/10.24843/KS.2022.v10.i08.p05.
John Griffthis. “What is Legal Pluralism?”. The Journal of Legal Pluralism and Unoffcial Law 18, No. 24 (1986). 10.1080/07329113.1986.10756387.
Julienne Weegels. “Prison Riots in Nicaragua: Negotiating Co-Governance Amid Creative Violence and Public Secrecy”. International Criminal Justice Review 30, No. 1 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1177/1057567719849485.
Kurnia Siwi Hastuti. “Pembaharuan Hukum Pedoman Pemidanaan terhadap Disparitas Putusan Pengembalian Kerugian Keuangan Negara Akibat Tindak Pidana Korupsi”. Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law and Criminology 2, No. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.18196/ijclc.v2i2.12294.
Kammersgaard, Tobias, ‘From Punishment to Help? Continuity and Change in the Norwegian Decriminalization Reform Proposal’, International Journal of Drug Policy, 113 (2023), 103963 <https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.drugpo.2023.103963>
Marder, Ian D, ‘Mapping Restorative Justice and Restorative Practices in Criminal Justice in the Republic of Ireland’, International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice, 70 (2022), 100544 <https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijlcj.2022.100544>
Maiza Putri. “The Effort to Reduce Over Capacity in Correctional Facilities through Social Work Alternatif Punishment”. Ius Ponale 2, No.2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.25041/ip.v2i2.2217.
Marcus Priyo Gunarto. “Asas Keseimbangan dalam Konsep Rancangan Undang-Undang Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana”. Mimbar Hukum 24, No. 1 (2012). https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16143.
M. Rizky Umanailo and Joko Setiyono. “Death Penalty for Perpetrators of Corruption Crimes Perspective of Criminal Law Reform”. International Journal of Social Science and Human Research 6, No. 1 (2023). 10.47191/ijsshr/v6-i1-57.
Novaria Devy Irmawanti and Barda Nawawi Arief. “Tujuan dan Pedoman Pemidanaan dalam Rangka Pembaharuan Sistem Pemidanaan Hukum Pidana”. Jurnal Pembangunan Hukum Indonesia 3, No. 2 (2021). https://doi.org/10.14710/jphi.v3i2.217-227.
Nurul P.A Nasution, Jubair, and Abdul Wahid. “The Concept of Restorative Justice in Handling Crimes in the Criminal Justice System”. European Journal of Law and Political Science 1, No. 5 (2022). 10.24018/ejpolitics.2022.1.5.37.
Nugroho, Trisapto Agung, ‘Peran Pembimbing Kemasyarakatan Dalam Rangka Mendukung Revitalisasi Penyelenggaraan Pemasyarakatan’, Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum, 14.3 (2020), 445 <https://doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2020.v14.445-468>
Nurcahyo, Nanang, Ramalina Ranaivo, and Mikea Manitra, ‘Why Have Indonesian Murderers Not Paid Victims ’ Heirs ? Murder Victims By Gender 2019-’, Journal of Law, Environmental and JusticeEnvironmental and Justice, 1.2 (2023), 155–69 <https://doi.org/10.62264/jlej.v1i2.13>
Obani, Pedi, and Joyeeta Gupta, ‘Legal Pluralism in the Area of Human Rights: Water and Sanitation’, Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 11 (2014), 63–70 <https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cosust.2014.09.014>
Prianter Jaya Hairi. “Kontradiksi Pengaturan (Hukum yang Hidup di Masyarakat) sebagai Bagian dari Asas Legalitas Hukum Pidana Indonesia”. Negara Hukum 7, No. 1 (2016). 10.22212/jnh.v7i1.924.
Puteri Hikmawati. “Pidana Pengawasan Sebagai Pengganti Pidana Bersyarat Menuju Keadilan Restoratif”. Negara Hukum 7, No. 1 (2016). 10.22212/jnh.v7i1.923.
Roby Anugrah. “Pemaafan Korban Ditinjau dari Tujuan Pemidanaan dalam Pembaharuan Hukum Pidana di Indonesia”. Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 8, No. 1 (2019). http://dx.doi.org/10.30652/jih.v8i1.5939.
Saputra, Rian, Muhammad Khalif Ardi, Pujiyono Pujiyono, and Sunny Ummul Firdaus, ‘Reform Regulation of Novum in Criminal Judges in an Effort to Provide Legal Certainty’, JILS (Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies), 6.2 (2021), 437–82 <https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.v6i2.51371>
Saputra, Rian, M Zaid, Pujiyono Suwadi, Jaco Barkhuizen, and Tiara Tiolince, ‘Reconstruction of Chemical Castration Sanctions Implementation Based on the Medical Ethics Code (Comparison with Russia and South Korea)’, Lex Scientia Law Review, 7.1 (2023), 61–118 <https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v7i1.64143>
Sasono, Satryo, Isharyanto Isharyanto, and Delasari Krisda, ‘Child and Women Domestic Abuse Victims ’ Social Health Insurance Protection : An Affirmative Justice Perspective’, Journal of Law, Environmental and JusticeEnvironmental and Justice, 1.2 (2023), 105–21 <https://doi.org/10.62264/jlej.v1i2.8>
Tamanaha, Brian Z., A Realistic Theory of Law, A Realistic Theory of Law, 2017 <https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316979778>
———, Legal Pluralism Explained: History, Theory, Consequences, Legal Pluralism Explained: History, Theory, Consequences (Madison Avenue, New York: Oxford University Press, 2021) <https://doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190861551.001.0001>
———, Sociological Approaches to Theories of Law, Sociological Approaches to Theories of Law, 2022, MMMMMDCCCXV <https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009128193>
Zaid, M, Rabani Merton Halawa, Kartika Asmanda, Fadhel Arjuna Adinda, and Lamberton Cait, ‘Eradicating Public Official Corruption Indonesia : A Revolutionary Paradigm Focusing on State Financial Losses’, Wacana Hukum, 29.2 (2023), 87–111 <https://doi.org/10.33061/wh.v29i2.9564>
Tody Sasimtha Jiwa Utama. “’Hukum yang Hidup’ dalam Rancangan Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP): Antara Akomodasi dan Negasi”. Masalah-Masalah Hukum 49, No. 1 (2020). 10.14710/mmh.49.1.2020.14-25.
Trianto and Muhammad Marizal. “Konsep Moderasi Pidana Mati RKUHP dalam Perspektif HAM dan Kepentingan Negara”. Volkgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi 5, No. 1 (2022). https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v5i1.6399.
Victorio H. Situmorang. “Lembaga Pemasyarakatan Sebagai Bagian dari Penegakan Hukum (Correctional Institution as Part of Law Enforcement)”. Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum 13, No. 1 (2019). http://dx.doi.org/10.30641/kebijakan.2019.V13.85-98.
Article Details
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:
- Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
- The author grants the journal, the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
- Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
- The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License