Role and position of Indonesian Medical Disciplinary Honour Council: fair medical dispute resolution

Article Sidebar

Published Nov 29, 2023
DOI : https://doi.org/10.62264/jlej.v1i3.15
Citation Analysis
Keywords
Medical Disputes, Doctor, Medical Ethics Council
Issue
Vol. 1 No. 3 (2023): Journal of Law, Environmental and Justice
Section
Articles
Article Statistics
Reader : 182 times
Download : 160 times

Main Article Content

Muhammad Khalif Ardi

Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Al-Azhar, Mataram

FX Hastowo Broto Laksito

Faculty of Law, Universitas Slamet Riyadi, Surakarta

Andriamalala Laurent

ASTA Research Center

Abstract

The main aim of this study is to offer a detailed account of the role and status of the Medical Ethics Council of Indonesia (MKDKI) in promoting the fair resolution of medical disputes in Indonesia. This study is a form of normative legal research. The research findings suggest that MKDKI should be the designated authority for resolving medical disputes since it has the requisite expertise in applying professional discipline in the medical domain. Moreover, MKDKI is a reputable organization assessing whether a physician has breached professional disciplinary norms. The phrase "can" in Article 66 paragraph (1) of Law Number 29 of 2004 governing Medical Practice includes the option to file a complaint against MKDKI or choose not to do so. Legal ambiguity may arise, requiring substituting the term "can" with "must." Consequently, all grievances related to medical matters must be addressed exclusively through MKDKI as an obligatory measure. Conducting a judicial review of Article 66, paragraph (1) of Law Number 29 of 2004 regarding Medical Practice is essential. Furthermore, it is crucial to consider the jurisdiction of the Medical Council of Indonesia (MKDKI) in establishing compensation for parties involved in disputes. For the sake of legal precision for both medical professionals and the general population, every decision made by the MKDKI (Medical Knowledge and Decision-making Institute) must be thoroughly evaluated.
References

Abubakar, Hamdani, ‘Kedudukan Audit Medis Dalam Penegakan Hukum Tindak Pidana Di Bidang Medis’, Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 3.2 (2018), 263–83 <https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol3.iss2.art2>

Aditya, I Made, Mantara Putra, I B Gde, and Agustya Mahaputra, ‘Perlindungan Konsumen Atas Tindakan Medis Bidang Kecantikan Di Rejuvie Clinic’, Kertha Wicaksana, 13.1 (2019), 1–5

Afandi, Dedi, ‘Mediasi: Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis’, Majalah Kedokteran Indonesia, 59.5 (2009), 189–93

Afiful Jauhani, Muhammad, Supianto Supianto, and Tioma R. Hariandja, ‘Kepastian Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis Melalui Mediasi Di Luar Pengadilan’, WELFARE STATE Jurnal Hukum, 1.1 (2022), 29–58 <https://doi.org/10.56013/welfarestate.v1i1.1470>

Andiani, Tara Nadya, FX Hastowo Broto Laksito, and Jose Gama Santos, ‘Evidence from Indonesia on the Legal Policy Confronting Discrimination of Minority Groups Based on Race and Ethnicity’, Wacana Hukum, 29.2 (2023), 146–62 <https://doi.org/10.33061/wh.v29i2.9808>

Anindyajati, Titis, Irfan Nur Rachman, and Anak Agung Dian Onita, ‘Konstitusionalitas Norma Sanksi Pidana Sebagai Ultimum Remedium Dalam Pembentukan Perundang-Undangan’, Jurnal Konstitusi, 12.4 (2016), 872 <https://doi.org/10.31078/jk12410>

Azizah, Mabarroh, ‘Peran Negara Dalam Perlindungan Konsumen Muslim Di Indonesia’, Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Dan Konstitusi, 4.2 (2021), 153–65 <https://doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v4i2.5738>

Chen, Chiehfeng, Ching Feng Lin, Cha Chun Chen, Shih Feng Chiu, Fuh Yuan Shih, Shu Yu Lyu, and others, ‘Potential Media Influence on the High Incidence of Medical Disputes from the Perspective of Plastic Surgeons’, Journal of the Formosan Medical Association, 116.8 (2017), 634–41 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfma.2017.01.011>

Chintia, Deby, and Anggraeni Endah Kusumaningrum, ‘Peran Rekam Medis Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis Antara Dokter Dan Pasien’, Jurnal JURISTIC, 1.01 (2020), 8 <https://doi.org/10.35973/jrs.v1i01.1448>

Dwi Erawati, Ambar, and Hargianti Dini Iswandari, ‘Ownership of Medical Records in Indonesia: Discourse on Legal Certainty and Justice’, Udayana Journal of Law and Culture, 6.2 (2022), 184 <https://doi.org/10.24843/ujlc.2022.v06.i02.p04>

Fitriono, Riska Andi, Budi Setyanto, and Rehnalemken Ginting, ‘Penegakan Hukum Malpraktik Melalui Pendekatan Mediasi Penal’, Yustisia Jurnal Hukum, 5.1 (2016), 101–2 <https://doi.org/10.20961/yustisia.v5i1.8724>

Hartanto, Naomi Jesica, Arlene Agustina, and Klarika Permana, ‘Criminal Violations of the Medical Ethics Code by Dr. Bimanesh’, FIAT JUSTISIA:Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 12.4 (2018), 329 <https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v12no4.1378>

Hatta, Muhammad, ‘The Position of Expert Witnesses in Medical Malpractice Cases in Indonesia’, Al-Ahkam, 18.1 (2018), 47 <https://doi.org/10.21580/ahkam.2018.18.1.2306>

Istiana Heriani, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Atas Hak Pasien Dari Penyelesaian Sengketa Medik Antara Pasien Dengan Dokter Dan/Atau Tenaga Medis Serta Rumah Sakit’, Al – Ulum Ilmu Sosial Dan Humaniora, 5.2 (2019), 1–10

Kusumaningrum, Anggraeni Endah, ‘Mediasi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis Sebagai Upaya Perlindungan Pasien’, Hukum Dan Dinamika Masyarakat, 14.1 (2016), 70–78 <https://doi.org/10.36356/hdm.v14i1.445>

Li, Niying, Zhan Wang, and K. Dear, ‘Violence against Health Professionals and Facilities in China: Evidence from Criminal Litigation Records’, Journal of Forensic and Legal Medicine, 67.May (2019), 1–6 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jflm.2019.07.006>

Muhlis, Syamsul Rijal, Indar Nambung, and Sabir Alwy, ‘Kekuatan Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Medik Pasien Dengan Rumah Sakit Melalui Jalur Mediasi’, Jurnal Ilmiah Dunia Hukum, 5.1 (2020), 31–40

Mukhti Fajar, and Yulianto Achmad, ‘Dualisme Penelitian Hukum Normatif Dan Empiris’, Fiat Justisia Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 8.1 (2014), 15–35

Mulyadi, Deri, Elwi Danil, Wila Chandrawila, and Kurnia Warman, ‘Medical Negligence Dispute Settlement in Indonesia’, Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine and Toxicology, 14.4 (2020), 4229–33 <https://doi.org/10.37506/ijfmt.v14i4.12304>

Nasution, Muhammad Andriady Saidi, Beni Satria, and Irwan Jasa Tarigan, ‘Mediasi Sebagai Komunikasi Hukum Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Medik Antara Dokter Dan Pasien’, Jurnal Hukum Kesehatan Indonesia, 1.02 (2022), 86–96 <https://doi.org/10.53337/jhki.v1i02.14>

Prabandari, Dwi Resti, Achmad Busro, and Ery Agus Priyono, ‘Tinjauan Yuridis Wanprestasi Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Medik (Studi Kasus Putusan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 2863K/PDT/2011’, Diponegoro Law Journal, 8.2 (2019), 1014–25

Prahara, Didith, ‘Penyelesaian Dugaan Kelalaian Medik Melalui Mediasi (Studi Pasal 29 Undang-Undang No. 36 Tahun 2009 Tentang Kesehatan)’, Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum De Jure, 17.740 (2017), 429–43

Purwadi, Ari, ‘Prinsip Praduga Selalu Bertanggung-Gugat Dalam Sengketa’, PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law), 4.1 (2017), 104–21 <https://doi.org/10.22304/pjih.v4n1.a6>

Ramadhani, Sulava Sururi, ‘Upaya Penyelesaian Malpraktek Medis Dengan Menghadirkan Payung Hukum Tindak Pidana Medis’, Wijayakusuma Law Review, 4.2 (2022), 21–26

Ridwan, Ridwan, ‘Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Pidana Terhadap Pelanggaran Rahasia Medis’, Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan, 49.2 (2019), 338 <https://doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol49.no2.2007>

Santoso, Arif Dian, Isharyanto, and Adi Sulistiyono, ‘Penyelesaian Sengketa Medik Melalui Mediasi Oleh Majelis Kehormatan Disiplin Kedokteran Indonesia (Mkdki) Untuk Dapat Menjamin Keadilan Dalam Hubungan Dokter Dan Pasien’, Jurnal Hukum Dan Pembangunan Ekonomi, 7.1 (2019), 29 <https://doi.org/10.20961/hpe.v7i1.29176>

Saputra, Rian, M Zaid, Pujiyono Suwadi, Jaco Barkhuizen, and Tiara Tiolince, ‘Reconstruction of Chemical Castration Sanctions Implementation Based on the Medical Ethics Code (Comparison with Russia and South Korea)’, Lex Scientia Law Review, 7.1 (2023), 61–118 <https://doi.org/10.15294/lesrev.v7i1.64143>

Shenoy, A., G.N. Shenoy, and G.G. Shenoy, ‘Res Ipsa Loquitur: An Insight into the Novel Seven ‘I’s of Indicative Treatment - A Potential Defense for the Defendant Doctor’, Ethics, Medicine and Public Health, 21 (2022), 100751 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jemep.2021.100751>

Shin, Hyeun Kyoo, Soo Jin Jeong, Byoung Kab Kang, and Myeong Soo Lee, ‘Medical Dispute Cases Involving Traditional Korean Medical Doctors: A Survey’, European Journal of Integrative Medicine, 6.4 (2014), 497–501 <https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eujim.2014.05.004>

Sinaga, Niru Anita, ‘Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis Di Indonesia’, Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Dirgantara, 11.2 (2021), 1–22 <https://journal.universitassuryadarma.ac.id/index.php/jihd/article/view/765>

Siregar, Boy, Alpi Sahari, and Ahmad Fauzi, ‘Analisis Yuridis Terhadap Perlindungan Hukum Profesi Dokter Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis’, Legalitas: Jurnal Hukum, 14.1 (2022), 27 <https://doi.org/10.33087/legalitas.v14i1.279>

Sulolipu, Andi Baji, Susilo Handoyo, and Roziqin, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Profesi Dokter Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis Berdasarkan Prinsip Keadilan Legal Protection of the Professional Doctor in the Settlement of Medical Disputes Based on the Principle of Justice’, Jurnal Projudice : Jurnal Online Mahasiswa Pascasarjana Uniba, 1.1 (2019), 60–82

Sumarto, Sumarto, and Yan Rahadian, ‘Evaluasi Penerapan Metode Penghitungan Kerugian Negara Dalam Membantu Penanganan Kasus Tindak Pidana Korupsi’, Jurnal ASET (Akuntansi Riset), 12.1 (2020), 117–29 <https://doi.org/10.17509/jaset.v12i1.23866>

Suparman, Rossi, ‘Perlindungan Hukum Dan Tanggung Jawab Rumah Sakit Terhadap Dokter Dalam Sengketa Medis’, Syiar Hukum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 17.2 (2020), 188–215 <https://doi.org/10.29313/shjih.v17i2.5441>

Suwadi, Pujiyono, Priscilla Wresty Ayuningtyas, Shintya Yulfa Septiningrum, and Reda Manthovani, ‘Legal Comparison of the Use of Telemedicine between Indonesia and the United States’, International Journal of Human Rights in Healthcare, ahead-of-p.ahead-of-print (2022) <https://doi.org/10.1108/IJHRH-04-2022-0032>

Syaufi, Ahmad, Diana Haiti, and Mursidah, ‘Application of Restorative Justice Values in Settling Medical Malpractice Cases’, International Journal of Criminology and Sociology, 10.0511 (2021), 103–10 <https://doi.org/10.6000/1929-4409.2021.10.14>

Toguan, Zulfikri, and Ricky Ricky, ‘Hak Imunitas Dokter Dalam Penyelenggaraan Praktik Medis Di Rumah Sakit’, Jurnal Lex Renaissance, 6.1 (2021), 193–205 <https://doi.org/10.20885/jlr.vol6.iss1.art14>

Utomo, Laksanto, ‘Penyelesaian Malpraktek Di Bidang Kedokteran Dalam Sistem Peradilan Indonesia’, Jurnal Lex Publica, 1.2 (2015), 165–79

Vatikawa, Afrizal, and Amnawaty Amnawaty, ‘Medical Record Data Counterfeiting by Doctors in Indonesia Reviewed from the Ethics, Discipline, and Legal Aspects’, FIAT JUSTISIA:Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, 12.3 (2018), 224 <https://doi.org/10.25041/fiatjustisia.v12no3.1324>

Zaluchu, Tiberius, and Dhoni Yusra, ‘Penyelesaian Sengketa Medis Antara Pasien Atau Keluarga Pasien Dengan Dokter Berdasarkan Ketentuan Hukum Di Indonesia’, Krtha Bhayangkara, 16.2 (2022), 237–58

Article Details

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Authors who publish with this journal agree to the following terms:

  1. Copyright on any article is retained by the author(s).
  2. The author grants the journal, the right of first publication with the work simultaneously licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution License that allows others to share the work with an acknowledgment of the work’s authorship and initial publication in this journal.
  3. Authors are able to enter into separate, additional contractual arrangements for the non-exclusive distribution of the journal’s published version of the work (e.g., post it to an institutional repository or publish it in a book), with an acknowledgment of its initial publication in this journal.
  4. Authors are permitted and encouraged to post their work online (e.g., in institutional repositories or on their website) prior to and during the submission process, as it can lead to productive exchanges, as well as earlier and greater citation of published work.
  5. The article and any associated published material is distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License